Chiefs: 1 free agent signing Brett Veach regrets

17



The Kansas Metropolis Chiefs went into the free-agent market on the lookout for a weapon for quarterback Patrick Mahomes in 2018. What they acquired was up-and-down.There’s a cause the Kansas Metropolis Chiefs have gone to 2 Tremendous Bowls in a row. Common supervisor Brett Veach has gotten it proper most of the time.Nonetheless, each group has misses, and the Chiefs aren’t proof against that.So which free-agent signing in Veach’s tenure would he need a redo? Sammy Watkins qualifies.Sammy Watkins had his moments however availability was an issueHere’s the factor about Watkins: His signing in 2018 wasn’t a catastrophe. The Chiefs acquired some nice contributions out of him earlier than he left for the Ravens this offseason.Nonetheless, the addition didn’t precisely work out the way in which Veach may need hoped.Watkins was speculated to be a risk for Patrick Mahomes to make the most of, however he spent a lot time on the harm checklist his worth was diminished. He missed 14 regular-season video games over three years and had inconsistent manufacturing as he got here out and in of the lineup.The Chiefs paid Watkins $42 million over three years. They might have anticipated much more than 1,613 yards and eight touchdowns for that form of cash.His playoff contributions in the course of the Chiefs Tremendous Bowl run in 2020 took the sting off of that funding, leaving followers grateful and annoyed in equal measure.One of many greatest points with the Watkins signing has much less to do with Watkins himself and extra to do with what may have been. Allen Robinson was the opposite large free agent available on the market in 2018. Each have been 24 years outdated, however Robinson was coming off an harm.The Chiefs acquired Watkins whereas Robinson signed with the Bears. In Chicago, he’s been a constant producer, with 1,000 yards in every of the previous two seasons. Critically he’s performed 45 of 48 video games within the final three years.What if Robinson had signed with the Chiefs as an alternative of the Bears? That offense would have been much more harmful.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More